The political "silly season" is in full swing. Republicans, Independents and a few Democrats are in the process of choosing the candidate that: a) they think would be the best choice for president, b) the candidate that has the best chance of defeating the current president (Barak Obama in this case) or c) as in the case of the few Dem's. that slip into the REPUBLICAN PRIMARIES, vote for the candidate that will, in their mind, lose to Obama. Why we let Independents and temporary Republicans - Dem's in sheep's clothing - choose our candidate is beyond me. I believe the best answer to making the right choice for our nominee is to vote for the one we most want to place in office. As my wife said this morning (yes she is still my wife and gratefully so) "we make the winner". Choosing the candidate who is the most "electable" is granting to oneself a foresight that is not available to us mere humans. Part of this thinking is brought about by listening to political pundits who espouse themselves as experts. These "experts" (the republican establishment for one) who actively work to elect a nominee that is more moderate, are of the belief that we cannot draw in the votes of independents which are vital to winning the White House. This has given us candidates such as Bob Dole and John McCain (yeah, real winners there). These establishment types were dead set against Reagan getting the nomination, but now they want to jump on the Reagan band wagon and are often quoted as having been a supporter of Reagan all along.
Everyone with a hint of conservatism are now looking for the next Ronald Reagan. The problem is, their will never be another Ronald Reagan. Heck, even Ronald Reagan wasn't Ronald Reagan before the office made him the great leader that we so fondly remember. Even in office, Reagan had made his fair share of mistakes; mistakes we now choose to forget or to deemphasize. The hard truth is none of us are great until that time we need to be great. The office of President of the United States of America is unlike any other job in the world. It makes great men out of ordinary people. This is why I put large emphasis on the moral fiber of whom I choose. It is not easy to determine the moral fiber of a candidate and we all have baggage. I dare say that few could undergo the scrutiny that our candidates are put through without looking bad. That scrutiny gains more intensity with the advent of time and technology.
I have chosen to vote for Rick Santorum, in part for his stance on unpopular issues. This indicates to me that he has the fortitude to do what he says he will do. I also believe that he will have the strength of character to change course if he finds that he has led us in the wrong direction. I am comfortable in voting for three of the four Republican candidates (with the notable exception of Ron Paul). However, I could not support any of these men for king. Thankfully, we do not need to choose an autocrat. This is the genius of our founders, knowing that people are fallible and susceptible to corruption. Balance among the three branches tempers the impact of choosing the wrong candidate.
So here in the land of ordinary people (Lilliputians), we will have to give up looking for giants and do the best we can to raise our kids to be of giant character and to elevate our standards so that when the time comes we can find amongst ourselves tomorrow's leaders and today's banner bearers.
7 comments:
So, does this mean you're back blogging?
You're back!
And I'm glad you're still with the wife. ;-0
I like Santorum; but my first choice is Romney. Right now I think electability is important because my first priority is to defeat Barack Obama. I also think he's a problem solver and we need that.
Welcome back.
Raising kids to be giants sounds like a daunting task. Hopefully it is possible.
Good to see you again, and I'm so happy to hear your wife is still with you.
I would be happy with Santorum but Newt is just as much a progressive and egomaniac as Obama so he's definitely not an option for me. Ultimately I'm going for Romney. While it's true we have never elected moderates, I believe Romney is fiscally conservative(I believe he's become more socially conservative too, but that's a harder sell to the average person because of his past) and that he can attract moderates with that platform.
Our country will not survive another fours of this president and so my decision is substantially based on who can beat him and hopefully if/when Romeny wins we can continue to help change the culture so that conservatives are more palatable to the general public.
That's the hope anyway, what will probably ultimately happen is a whole other discussion.
This is Jay's wife. He's still driving over-the-road, so I read your responses to him while he was on the phone and he asked that I respond for him.
He says: Your decisions are well thought out. I'm back to blogging when I'm home and have the chance. Hopefully, I'll have my laptop on the road with me soon. Barb, the way to raise giant children is to show giant love.
At least you have formed a strong opinion and are sticking with it! Too many people I know are either voting however their family votes or don't plan to vote at all. Hey, if you don't vote, you've got no say.
Welcome back! I think it's very exciting to follow the Republican primaries. I would vote Republican, if I was an American, and I would choose Mitt Romney. However, I agree with you about the three possible candidates.
I grew up in Europe during the Cold War, and to me Ronald Reagan was the shining hope of better times. He managed to break down barriers, and he made communism a less dangerous threat. He and good ol' Maggie (Thatcher) became the leaders I still admire.
Post a Comment